Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
The guy was lazy and didn't write anything...
January 31st, 09:36
1) Determine whether it is "Normal Waiting" or "Abnormally Stuck".
You can first look at 3 signals: whether the page release time is within 7-14 days, whether there are only a small number of pages with this status, and whether the page has appeared in the XML Sitemap.
If all three are satisfied, most likely belong to the normal crawling and evaluation stage, do not need to do it immediately.
2) Under what circumstances is it useless to "wait"?
The following cases will not be solved automatically by time: the page has almost no internal links (isolated page), the content is highly similar to the existing pages on the site, canonical points to other URLs, and too many similar articles are published on the same topic for a short period of time.
In this case, Google has been crawled, but judged that "it is not worth entering the index".
3) The most effective way of manual intervention (no tossing)
Prioritize these 3 things: add internal links, link to the page from related old articles or columns, and enhance the density of information on the first screen.
The first 2-3 paragraphs directly answer the user's question, avoid too much padding, confirm canonical as self-referential, avoid being judged as a duplicate page, and then go to GSC to request reindexing after doing so.
4) What "intervention actions" are counterproductive?
It is not recommended: frequent deletion and reposting, clicking "request to index" several times in a row, forcing keywords to be stacked for indexing, changing URLs or titles arbitrarily.
These operations will allow Google to reassess the stability of the page, but slow down the inclusion.
5) a practical judgment standard
If an article: has been crawled, there is no noindex / robots problem, there are at least 1-2 related internal links, the content obviously solves an independent problem, then it is included, just a matter of time, not a plug-in problem.
简体中文 
English 
日本語 
Français 
Español 
