Hermes 和 OpenClaw 有什么区别？功能对比和升级理由
如果你之前用过 Hermes Agent，现在看到 OpenClaw 可能会疑惑：这俩到底什么关系？该不该升级？这篇文章帮你理清两者的区别，以及升级的实际好处。
Hermes 和 OpenClaw 的关系
简单说：OpenClaw 是 Hermes 的下一代产品。Hermes 是早期版本，功能相对基础；OpenClaw 在 Hermes 基础上重构了架构，增加了多 Agent 路由、定时任务、多平台消息接入等能力。
核心功能对比
消息渠道支持
- Hermes：支持 Telegram、WhatsApp，配置较繁琐
- OpenClaw：支持 Telegram、WhatsApp、Discord、Slack、Signal、微信、iMessage，统一配置格式
多 Agent 管理
- Hermes：单 Agent 模式，一个实例只能跑一个人格
- OpenClaw：原生多 Agent 路由，一个 Gateway 可以管理多个 Agent，按规则分发消息
timed task
- Hermes：无内置定时功能，需要外部 cron
- OpenClaw：内置 cron 系统，支持 at/every/cron 三种调度模式
技能扩展
- Hermes：手动编写工具函数
- OpenClaw：ClawHub 技能市场，一键安装社区技能
什么情况下应该升级？
如果你符合以下任一条件，建议升级：
- 需要接入 3 个以上消息平台
- 需要一个 AI 同时扮演多个角色（客服、运营、分析）
- 需要定时自动执行任务（日报、巡检、发布）
- 想用社区现成的技能而不是全部自己写
升级会丢数据吗？
不会。OpenClaw 提供完整的迁移工具，支持从 Hermes 一键导入配置。详细步骤参考：OpenClaw 怎么从 Hermes 迁移
common problems
升级后还能用原来的 API Key 吗？
可以。OpenClaw 使用相同的环境变量格式，原有的 Key 直接继承。
Hermes 的 SOUL.md 格式还兼容吗？
兼容。OpenClaw 能读取 Hermes 格式的 SOUL.md，但建议逐步迁移到 identity 配置块。
两个可以同时运行吗？
可以。只要监听不同端口，Hermes 和 OpenClaw 可以并行运行，方便你逐步切换。
OpenClaw 收费吗？
OpenClaw 本身开源免费。你只需要为底层 LLM API 调用付费（如 OpenAI、Anthropic）。
社区活跃吗？
OpenClaw 有活跃的 Discord 社区和 GitHub 仓库，文档持续更新中。
相关教程：OpenClaw 怎么从 Hermes 迁移 | OpenClaw 怎么做 SEO 关键词研究 | OpenClaw 怎么设置定时任务
官方文档：Hermes vs OpenClaw
实际使用场景对比
以下是几个典型场景下两者的差异：
场景一：电商客服
Hermes 时代你需要为每个平台（微信、Telegram）单独部署一个实例。OpenClaw 只需一个 Gateway，配置多个 channel，同一个 Agent 同时服务所有渠道。客户在微信问的问题，同一套知识库回答。
场景二：内容自动化
Hermes 没有内置定时功能，你需要用系统 crontab 调用脚本。OpenClaw 直接在配置里写 schedule，支持 cron 表达式、固定间隔、一次性定时三种模式。日报、周报、自动发布全部内置搞定。
场景三：多角色协作
Hermes 一个实例一个人格。如果你需要客服 + 运营 + 数据分析三个角色，就要跑三个 Hermes 进程。OpenClaw 原生支持多 Agent 路由——一个进程，按消息来源/关键词/时间自动分发到不同 Agent。
Link to this article:https://www.361sale.com/en/87594/The article is copyrighted and must be reproduced with attribution.
简体中文 
English 
日本語 
Français 
Español 
0
Now definitely still do SEO, just play changed. Previously rely on heaps of content, heaps of keywords can have traffic, and now pay more attention to the quality of content + brand trust + user experience. In addition to relying solely on SEO is actually more and more difficult, a lot of good basically SEO + social media + content marketing + private domain conversion to do together. SEO is still a long-term customer acquisition channel, but can no longer be taken as the only channel.Hehe is working.
March 11, 10:540
Normal, included only on behalf of Google to see the page, does not mean that the ranking immediately, "has been included but not ranked" usually because: Keyword competition, page weight is low, the content is not strong enough, the page is relatively new. Continue to optimize the long-tail keywords, content quality and internal chain, usually takes a little time, the ranking will slowly come out!Amelia Foster March 6, 16:200
Do you have a screenshot?lit. even a son who is not a fish knows the joy of fish March 6, 09:230
Don't pile on the optimization plugins first, locate the bottlenecks first: Use Query Monitor to see slow SQL, slow hooks. Pause all plugins for comparison, then turn them on one by one. Check autoload is too big (options table). Check database indexes with large table queries. Tackle host/database performance first if server TTFB is high.Hehe is working.
March 3, 16:470
Hi Windjammer, there's really no need to mess with complicated local environments, regular people follow these steps and the update basically won't crash the site 👇 First, backup the whole site, files + database are prepared, this is the bottom line, out of the problem can be a key to go back. Don't change the whole thing in one click, change it in batches, change the unimportant plug-ins first, and then change the core ones. Immediately after the update, clear the cache, go to the foreground to check the home page, article page, buttons, forms, these key positions. It is best to install a plug-in that supports version rollback, in case of a crash, cut back to the old version in a second. To summarize: backup first, change in batches, check after changing, leave a way back, stable ✅😎 Hope this helps!bugbang March 2, 09:550
Usually it's not that the payment didn't work, but that the callback (webhook) didn't write back the order status. Troubleshooting steps: WooCommerce → Status → Logs: see if the payment gateway has webhook error / signature error / timeout Check if the site is blocked by WAF (Cloudflare, Pagoda Firewall, security plugins) Check if "Cache checkout pages/interface paths" is enabled (checkout pages and callback interfaces should not be cached) Look at the server error logs for 500/fatal errors that interrupt the callback execution. Solution: Release wp-json, wc-api, payment gateway callback URLs (configure as per gateway documentation) Disable cache and JS merge compression test on checkout page once If using Cloudflare: set no-challenge, no-block rules for callback URLsUlla Nala Zhenhuan (18嬛嬛嬛) January 31st, 09:360
1) Determine whether it is "Normal Waiting" or "Abnormally Stuck". You can first look at 3 signals: whether the page release time is within 7-14 days, whether there are only a small number of pages with this status, and whether the page has appeared in the XML Sitemap. If all three are satisfied, most likely belong to the normal crawling and evaluation stage, do not need to do it immediately. 2) Under what circumstances is it useless to "wait"? The following cases will not be solved automatically by time: the page has almost no internal links (isolated page), the content is highly similar to the existing pages on the site, canonical points to other URLs, and too many similar articles are published on the same topic for a short period of time. In this case, Google has been crawled, but judged that "it is not worth entering the index". 3) The most effective way of manual intervention (no tossing) Prioritize these 3 things: add internal links, link to the page from related old articles or columns, and enhance the density of information on the first screen. The first 2-3 paragraphs directly answer the user's question, avoid too much padding, confirm canonical as self-referential, avoid being judged as a duplicate page, and then go to GSC to request reindexing after doing so. 4) What "intervention actions" are counterproductive? It is not recommended: frequent deletion and reposting, clicking "request to index" several times in a row, forcing keywords to be stacked for indexing, changing URLs or titles arbitrarily. These operations will allow Google to reassess the stability of the page, but slow down the inclusion. 5) a practical judgment standard If an article: has been crawled, there is no noindex / robots problem, there are at least 1-2 related internal links, the content obviously solves an independent problem, then it is included, just a matter of time, not a plug-in problem.Post Porter January 30th 10:000
The new station does not do external links can be completely, the first content and station structure to do a good job more stable. Only rely on the content can generally get included and part of the long-tail word rankings, but the amount of high competition will be slow. It is recommended to wait for the site stable inclusion, 30-50 quality content, keywords began to enter the top 20/30, and then a small amount of external links, priority brand words/naked chain/citation type, do not come up to chase the number. 👍