What image formats are supported by Imagify vs WP Smush and how does WebP support compare?

No one wants to watch a web page load as slowly as an old cow pulling a broken cart. Truth be told, the main culprits of slowdowns are often unprocessed "big" images. In WordPress of the circle, if you want to speed up the site.Imagify and WP Smush Pretty much two names you can't get around.

Both of these tools have a great reputation, but when it comes to using them, they don't have the same temperament. Especially when it comes to the WebP format support that is so popular these days, if you choose the wrong one, you may not only save space, but also have to do a lot of extra work.

Imagify: "Minimalist" for Efficiency

Imagify was created by the WP Rocket team. Perhaps it is inherited from the family gene, this tool from the bones of a "fully automated" drive, especially for those who do not want to spend energy on trivial webmasters.

What formats can it swallow?

Imagify has a pretty good appetite for media files. In addition to our most commonly used JPEG and PNG, it is also quite sophisticated processing of GIF. More surprisingly, it also reached out to the PDF. In fact, in similar plug-ins, PDF documents can also be compressed by the feature is not common. If your site is filled with downloadable product manuals or technical documents, Imagify can help you save a large chunk of server space.

Clever WebP Conversions

Imagify seems to be very sincere in dealing with WebP. It doesn't hide it like some plugins do, but it directly closes the loop on the process.

• Silent power in the background: All you have to do is pass images to the media library and Imagify will automatically generate a backup of the WebP version in the background.
• Senseless replacement: Even if your original image is a PNG, it can deliver a lighter WebP to the visitor's browser by rewriting the configuration file or tweaking the tags.
• Threshold issues: The features are open to free users, but it will have a limit on the total amount per month. It's enough for niche blogs, but with a large amount of images, odds are you'll have to consider paying.

WP Smush: A Steady "Veteran"

Compared to Imagify, WP Smush (or Smush as we used to call it) is more of an industry veteran. It's backed by the WPMU DEV team and has millions of installations worldwide, a volume that speaks for its stability.

Pixel-level "lossless" persistence

Smush handles JPEGs, PNGs and GIFs with great care. If you're a photographer or designer who is almost paranoid about image quality, its "lossless compression" technology will probably appeal to you. Simply put, it's like "dehydrating" an image at a microscopic level, making the file smaller but not losing any pixel information. However, it is not currently intended to touch PDF.

The "thresholds" of WebP

Smush draws a clear red line in the sand when it comes to WebP support:

• The free version is an embarrassment: If you're using the free version, Smush can only help you optimize those "already WebP"File". Trying to get it to automatically convert JPEGs to WebP?Sorry, that's not going to work.
• Pro version privileges: It's only when you upgrade to the Pro version that its power is truly unleashed. It utilizes its own CDN to dynamically convert images as soon as they are delivered to the user. It's a great way to do it, and it can even take some of the computing pressure off your servers, but only if your wallet is ready.

Close Quarters: Who's Better in the WebP Battlefield?

In the end, who knows more about WebP? Let's not look at those false, directly look at the core of several dimensions. Perhaps through this comparison, you will have a clear idea in your heart:

Key Features	Imagify	WP Smush (free version)	WP Smush (Pro version)
Automatic WebP generation	Reach for it.	Forget it.	It's all very clear.
PDF Compression	It's just a matter of doing it.	unsupported	unsupported
Conversion Limits	As long as there's enough traffic, feel free to turn	conversion is not possible	stress-free
Distribution logic	local replacement	It doesn't work.	High-end CDN Dynamic Downstream

To put it bluntly, Imagify's strength is that it takes a "premium" feature like WebP and makes it affordable. Smush, on the other hand, uses WebP as a major incentive for users to upgrade to the paid version.

Conclusion: Which god should you invite to your site?

Which tool you choose really depends on how much you are willing to pay for "speed" and how big your site is.

If you're just looking for a money-saving, hassle-free solution to make all your site-wide images WebP without even realizing it, the Imagify Definitely the first choice. You just need to click the mouse and leave the rest to it, and it's a really great feeling.

However, if your website traffic has taken off, or if you are a loyal WPMU DEV user yourself, the Smush Pro resulting from CDN Optimization is probably better suited for the big game. It costs a bit of money, but that kind of worldwide accelerated experience really isn't comparable to a regular plugin.

Picture optimization, in fact, there is no need to pursue absolute perfection, WebP is now the standard, no matter which one you choose, hurry up to move is the serious thing.

Contact Us
Can't read the tutorial? Contact us for a free answer! Free help for personal, small business sites!	Customer Service
① Tel: 020-2206-9892
② QQ咨询：1025174874
(iii) E-mail: info@361sale.com
④ Working hours: Monday to Friday, 9:30-18:30, holidays off